PIT is a state of the art mutation testing system, providing gold standard test coverage for Java and the jvm. It's fast, scalable and integrates with modern test and build tooling.
Mutation testing is conceptually quite simple.
Faults (or mutations) are automatically seeded into your code, then your tests are run. If your tests fail then the mutation is killed, if your tests pass then the mutation lived.
The quality of your tests can be gauged from the percentage of mutations killed.
To put it another way - PIT runs your unit tests against automatically modified versions of your application code. When the application code changes, it should produce different results and cause the unit tests to fail. If a unit test does not fail in this situation, it may indicate an issue with the test suite.
Traditional test coverage (i.e line, statement, branch etc) measures only which code is executed by your tests. It does not check that your tests are actually able to detect faults in the executed code. It is therefore only able to identify code the is definitely not tested.
The most extreme example of the problem are tests with no assertions. Fortunately these are uncommon in most code bases. Much more common is code that is only partially tested by its suite. A suite that only partially tests code can still execute all its branches (examples).
As it is actually able to detect whether each statement is meaningfully tested, mutation testing is the gold standard against which all other types of coverage are measured.
There are other mutation testing system for Java, but they are not widely used.
They are mostly slow, difficult to use and written to meet the needs of academic research rather than real development teams.
PIT is different. It's
The reports produced by PIT are in an easy to read format combining line coverage and mutation coverage information.
Example snippet taken from coverage report of Wicket Core
Light green shows line coverage, dark green shows mutation coverage.
Light pink show lack of line coverage, dark pink shows lack of mutation coverage.
"... This gave us extreme confidence in our tests ... The effects of that confidence were outstanding."
"... While we also used Clover for basic code coverage, as we got our PIT mutation coverage up into the 90s I stopped paying much attention to Clover"
Kyle Winter, Lead Software Engineer, The Ladders
". . . from my own personal experience of using PIT I've found it not only gives me confidence in the quality of both my own and others unit test quality, but has actually been a design aid in so much that as well as finding untested code, it can also find redundant code that when deleted still implements the intended functionality."
Matt Kirk, Lead Developer, British Sky Broadcasting